Fidelity Investments, one of the world’s largest asset managers, has formally urged the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to establish a clear and comprehensive regulatory framework for broker-dealers operating in the crypto asset space. In a letter submitted on Friday, the firm responded to a request for public input from the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, emphasizing that definitive rules are “critical” for the legitimate growth of tokenized securities trading.
Fidelity’s letter, authored by its general counsel Roberto Braceras, argues that the current regulatory ambiguity creates uncertainty for market participants. The firm specifically calls for rules governing not only the trading but also the custody of crypto assets on alternative trading systems (ATS), which are private trading venues regulated by the SEC.
The Complex Reality of Tokenized Assets
Fidelity highlights that tokenized instruments are not a monolithic category. Their issuance structures, legal rights, and valuation models can differ dramatically. For instance, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) can represent tokenized equities, real estate, bonds, or private credit—each with its own set of regulatory considerations.
“Tokenization models vary significantly in structure and in the rights afforded to holders,” the letter states. It explains a key distinction: in some structures, a crypto token represents an indirect security interest through a “securities entitlement,” while in others, the token itself might be classified as a securities-based swap, which has separate, stringent eligibility requirements.
This diversity means a one-size-fits-all regulatory approach is insufficient. Fidelity is pushing the SEC to develop nuanced rules that can accommodate these varied tokenized security issuance models, including those issued by third parties.
Bridging the Centralized and Decentralized Divide
A core part of Fidelity’s argument is the need to reconcile the regulatory treatment of traditional, intermediated trading systems with emerging, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. Braceras wrote that the SEC should “consider how intermediated and disintermediated trading venues can evolve and coexist.”
The firm points out a fundamental challenge: existing SEC reporting rules are built around a central authority that can produce detailed financial records. Decentralized platforms, which operate via smart contracts and distributed networks, often lack a single entity capable of fulfilling these traditional reporting obligations.
To address this, Fidelity recommends the SEC overhaul its reporting requirements to reflect the technological reality of distributed ledger technology (DLT). This would remove an “undue burden” from decentralized systems while ensuring appropriate oversight. Additionally, the letter urges the SEC to issue explicit guidance permitting broker-dealers to use DLT for ATS operations and recordkeeping, a step Fidelity sees as essential for modernization.
This call for updated rules aligns with signals from current SEC leadership. Under Chairman Paul Atkins, the commission has expressed support for 24/7 capital markets and has approved initiatives allowing financial firms to experiment with tokenized trading.
Regulatory Consensus on Capital Treatment
Separately, a joint policy statement from the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in March provided clarity on another front. The agencies stated that tokenized securities—such as tokenized equities, debt instruments, or REITs—are subject to the same banking capital requirements as their underlying traditional assets.
“The technologies used to issue and transact in a security do not generally impact its capital treatment,” the agencies concluded. This position aims to prevent regulatory arbitrage, ensuring that the method of issuance (digital token vs.纸质certificate) does not alter the fundamental risk profile or capital reserves a bank must hold.
Fidelity’s letter, therefore, operates within a landscape where the substance of an asset is increasingly being separated from its digital form. While federal banking agencies focus on consistent capital rules, the SEC is being pressed to build the operational rulebook for how these digital representations are traded and serviced in public markets.
The dialogue from Fidelity, a heavyweight with over $4 trillion in client assets, underscores a growing industry consensus: for tokenization to reach its potential, regulators must provide a bridge between legacy financial frameworks and new digital infrastructure. The path forward likely involves tailored rules that acknowledge technological innovation while upholding the core investor protections and market integrity goals of U.S. securities laws.
This article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy.
